DEFINITION1: Let and
be two sets and
be a relation. If the following two conditions are provided, then the relation
is called a “function” with domain
and codomain
and denoted by
or
.
1. ,
2. .
Henceforth, when we write , we will consider that “
is a function from
to
”.
As is seen from the definition, a function is a relation mapping each element in the domain to a unique element in the codomain. So, the notation is generally used instead of the notations
and
and read “
maps to
” or “
maps to
”. The notation
is read “
of
”. Each element of the domain is called an “argument” and for each
in the domain, the corresponding unique element
in the codomain is called “the function value at
”, “output
for an element
” or “the image
” under the function
. The set defined as
is called the “image” or the “range” of
. Sometimes a function is called a “map” or a “mapping”.
EXAMPLE1 (Identity function): Let be a set. The function
over
defined as
is called the “identity function” of
.
EXAMPLE2 (Constant function): Let and
be two non-empty set and
be a constant in
. The function
from
to
defined as
is called a “constant function”.
EXAMPLE3 (Inclusion function): Let be a set and
. The function
from
to
defined as
is called an “inclusion function”.
EXAMPLE4 (Restriction and extension): Let and
. The function
from
to
defined as
is called a “restriction” of
. Besides,
is called an “extension” of
.
EXAMPLE5 (Characteristic function): Let be a set and
. The function
from
to
defined as
is called the “characteristic function” of .
DEFINITION2: Let . If
, then the functions
and
are called “equal functions”.
DEFINITION3: Let . If it holds
for
, then
is called an “injective function”, an “injection” or an “one to one function”. Since the condition of being an injection is equivalent to the condition
, the last condition can be used as the definition of injection. As is seen from the definition, an injection is a function mapping two distinct arguments to two distinct images.
DEFINITION4: Let . If it holds
, then
is called a “surjective function”, a “surjection” or an “onto function”. A function is a surjection if and only if its image equal to its codomain.
DEFINITION5: A function is called a “bijective function”, a “bijection” or a “one to one correspondence” if it is both injective and surjective. The identity function of a set in Example1 can be given as an example.
EXAMPLE6: Let’s examine the following three functions ,
and
:
is injective because it separately maps the elements of
to the elements of
. However, for
in
, there is no an element
in
satisfying
.
is surjective because each element of
is the image of at least one element in
. However,
is not injective because
but
.
As is seen from the above figure, the function is both injective and surjective i.e.,
is a bijection.
The above three examples show us a function is injective if and only if any two arrows leaving from the domain don’t arrive the same images in the codomain, and a function is surjective if and only if for each element in the codomain, there exists at least one arrow leaving from the domain such that the arrow arrives this element. Unfortunately, these necessary and sufficient conditions cannot be used for a function whose domain or codomain has infinitely many elements because an infinite set cannot be displayed by the Venn diagram. There are many different ways for testing whether a function whose domain or codomain has infinitely many elements is injective (or surjective) or not. Let’s give some examples concerning the infinite sets:
EXAMPLE7: Let ,
,
,
.
is injective because
.
Choose for any
in
. Then,
. Hence
is surjective. Since
is both injective and surjective, it is a bijection.
EXAMPLE8: Let ,
.
is not injective because
but
.
is not surjective because there is no an element in
such that
for
in
.
EXAMPLE9: Consider the above function as
. Actually, the function is the same as the above function. Its codomain is only changed. Under the given conditions, we will investigate whether this function is injective (surjective) or not:
Let . Since
, it has the square root
. Choose
. Since
, then
is surjective. As above,
is not injective because
but
for
in the domain.
EXAMPLE10: This time, we consider the function as
. Then, similar to example9, one can prove that
is surjective. Now, we will investigate
is whether injective or not: Take
in
.
.
So, is injective.
Depending on the domain and the codomain of a function, the injectivity or the surjectivity can be changed. When the injectivity or the surjectivity of the function is asked, one should ask this question: What are the domain and the codomain of this function.
PROPOSITION1: Let and
be two sets with
elements and
. Then,
is injective if and only if it is surjective.
The above proposition is available for the finite sets. Over the infinite sets, an injective function doesn’t have to be surjective and a surjective function doesn’t have to be injective. The function from
to
is injective. However, it is not surjective because it is positive-valued.
DEFINITION6: Let and
be two sets,
,
and
. The sets defined as
,
are called the image of under
and the preimage or the inverse image of
under
, respectively. As is seen from the definition,
is formed the images of the elements of
and
is formed the elements in
whose images are in
. Particularly, if it is chosen by
, then
is range and denoted by
. It is clear that
,
,
and
.
EXAMPLE11: ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
. Then,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
PROPOSITION2: Let and
be two sets,
,
and
. Then,
a) ,
b) .
PROPOSITION3: Let and
be two sets and
. If
and
are two index sets and
,
are two families, then
a) ,
b) ,
c) ,
d) .
COROLLARY1: Let and
be two sets,
,
and
. Then,
a) ,
b) ,
c) ,
d) .
The property “b” in the proposition3 and its corollary attracts our attention. Although there are the equalities in the properties “a”, “c” and “d”, we can only say that is a subset of
. It is interesting. Since
is a subset of
, it may be equal. According to proposition1, there are two probabilities:
and
. The identity function of a set is an example for the second probability. Is there any example for the first probability? The following example is the answer of this question:
EXAMPLE12: Choose ,
,
,
and define
as
. It is clear that
is a function. Since
, then
. On the other hand, since
, then
. As is seen,
.
There are many examples for the two probabilities. Is there any criterion determining whether the left side is equal to the right side or not? The following proposition is the answer this question:
PROPOSITION4: Let . Then,
is injective.
PROPOSITION5: Let . Then,
a) ,
b) .
PROPOSITION6: Let . Then,
a) is injective
,
b) is surjective
,
c) is bijective
.
DEFINITION7: Let and
. The function
defined as
is called the composition of the functions
and
. (Note that the codomain of
is equal to the domain of
)
EXAMPLE13: Choose ,
and
. Then,
.
Let and
be two functions with suitably chosen domains and codomains. Is
equal to
? We will answer this question by the help of an example:
EXAMPLE14: Choose ,
and
. Since
and
,
then . We have just obtained an example about
. Is the proposition
always true? The answer of this question is “no”. For example, if we choose
and
, then
and
.
I.e., When we choose and
, it holds
. Consequently, if
and
are two functions with suitably chosen domains and codomains, then there are two probabilities:
and
.
PROPOSITION7: Let . Then,
and
.
PROPOSITION8: Let ,
and
. Then,
.
PROPOSITION9: Let and
. Then,
a) If and
are injective, then
is also injective.
b) If and
are surjective, then
is also surjective.
c) If is injective, then
is also injective.
d) If is surjective, then
is also surjective.
DEFINITION8: Let .
i) If there exists at least one function such that
, then the function
is called a right inverse of
.
ii) If there exists at least one function such that
, then the function
is called a left inverse of
.
The definitions (i) and (ii) can be given by the follows:
i*) If there exists at least one function such that
, then the function
is called a right inverse of
.
ii*) If there exists at least one function such that
, then the function
is called a left inverse of
.
PROPOSITION10: Let . Then,
a) There exists at least one right inverse of
is surjective.
b) There exists at least one left inverse of
is injective.
EXAMPLE15: Choose by
. If we define
as
then it holds because
,
. So,
has a left inverse.
Since the function given in example15 is injective, then it has a left inverse. However, according to proposition10, it has no a right inverse because it is not surjective. Example15 shows that a function can have a left inverse although it has no a right inverse.
EXAMPLE16: Choose by
. Since it is surjective, then it has a right inverse. Define
as
. Since
,
, then
is a right inverse of
. According to proposition10,
has no a left inverse because it is not injective.
PROPOSITION11: Let ,
and
. Then,
a) If is injective and
, then
(an injective function has the left cancellation property)
b) If is surjective and
, then
(a surjective function has the right cancellation property)
Now, let’s introduce the inverse function:
Let . Assume that
and
are left and right inverses of
, respectively. Then,
. I.e., if a function has both left and right inverses, then these are equal to each other. A function being both left inverse and right inverse of
is called an inverse of
. Now, let’s give the definition of “inverse”, more properly:
DEFINITION9: Let . If there exists a function
such as
and
, then the function
is called an inverse of
. Besides,
is called invertible.
PROPOSITION12: Let . Then,
has an inverse if and only if
is bijective.
PROOF: The proof of this proposition can be directly obtained from Proposition10.
EXAMPLE17: If we choose by
, then the function
defined by
is an inverse of
because
and
.
EXAMPLE18: If we choose by
, then the function
defined by
is an inverse of
because
and
.
EXAMPLE19: If we choose by
then the function
defined by
is an inverse of
because
and
.
Let the functions be two inverses of the function
. Then
is a left inverse of
and
is a right inverse of
. We have shown that a left inverse and a right inverse of a function are equal to each other. So,
. Consequently, If there exists an inverse of a function, then it is unique. This unique inverse is denoted by
.
PROPOSITION13: Let ,
. Then,
a) If is invertible, then
is also invertible and
. Besides,
is bijective.
b) If and
are invertible, then
is invertible and
.
THEOREM1: Let be a non-empty set and
. Then
is a group with the identity element
.
is commutative if and only if
.
DEFINITION10: Let be a non-empty set and
. Then we can define as,
,
,
and
.
Where is a natural number.


